The Controversy Surrounding Mammograms

I’ve got to get serious for a moment, folks, and talk about something that impacts the lives of millions of women and their families: breast cancer. While treatments have improved, this cancer is still far too common, affecting one of every eight women in the US according to the National Breast Cancer Foundation (https://www.nationalbreastcancer.org/breast-cancer-facts).

As part of the gold standard for detecting this disease early, mammograms are something that we’ve all heard recommended. But what shocked me and may shock you is the fact that studies are showing this diagnostic tool may not be the solution we thought it was.

One study, conducted by researchers at Dartmouth University and published in the New England Journal of Medicine (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1600249), came to the conclusion that a mammogram is more likely to catch to a small tumor that would remain benign than a tumor likely to become bigger and life-threatening. The researchers in this study reviewed research from the past 35 years, finding that around two thirds of the tumors detected by mammograms where less than two centimeters, non-harmful growths that were not likely to progress to cancer.

Another study, conducted by Danish researchers and published in The Annals of Internal Medicine (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28114661), had findings similar to the Dartmouth study. The Danish researchers also concluded that possibly one in every three women diagnosed with breast cancer had a tumor that may never have been life-threatening and received unnecessary medical treatment as a result. In the Danish study, researchers examined the medical records of all women who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 1980 to 2010. Based on the availability of mammogram screenings in the various regions of the country, researchers found that anywhere from 15 to 39 percent of the breast tumors found would not have become harmful.

Of course, these conclusions are somewhat controversial, although they are not entirely new. In 2012, researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health studied data from Norway and found that 15 to 25 percent of breast cancer cases that were revealed via a mammogram were over-diagnosed and never would have become dangerous tumors (https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2012/04/mammography-tied-to-overdiagnosis/).

Naturally, this doesn’t mean mammograms are over. More studies on these area are needed, and we still don’t entirely know which women should have mammograms and how often. As more data comes to light, the use of these diagnostic tools is likely to change for the better.

Related Posts

Menopause Education

It’s fair to say that women’s health has rarely been treated as a priority by the medical establishment. Not only is it underfunded, but there are a lot of people, both medical professionals and women on the street, who don’t have access to the right information to make educated decisions about it. We can see

Read More »

Adrenaline Rush

There are a lot of physiological processes involved in our fight or flight response, and more than one hormone has a part to play. If you ask most people, however, the one they’ll know about is adrenaline. The adrenaline rush is one of the most recognizable parts of our response to stress, and it has

Read More »

Hormones And Histamine

If you know anything about histamine (and you’re not a doctor or scientist who studies the stuff), it’s probably because of allergies. You need histamine for your immune response, but sometimes it gets carried away trying to battle things that aren’t actually threats. That’s an allergic reaction. A less talked-about aspect of histamine is how

Read More »
Scroll to Top